Friday, January 30, 2015

Gronk vs. Chancellor

     The main argument made by the associated is to show the number of great match-ups in the game on Sunday. The main match-up being super star tight end Rob Gronkowski versus the best strong safety in the NFL Kam Chancellor. Chancellor is a hybrid corner back, safety, linebacker containing characteristics of all three positions that make him better than most at his particular position. Gronkowski is dominant force on the field for the Patriots always performing to his highest possible ability, " only once this season did Gronkowski have fewer than three catches in a game"( Associated Press).  The author writes that the Super Bowl will be full of fantastic match-ups from Gronk vs. Chancellor to Brady vs. Wilson. It will be one amazing game.

    The author of this article claims that the match-ups will be more or less equal. I feel that he is wrong. I believe that while Chancellor is a tremendous defensive player, Gronk will be able to beat him 9 times out of 10. I also feel that our D-line will be able to stop Lynch in his tracks and Brady will throw all over the Seahawks defense. The author claims that game will be full of players that are at equal skill levels. I disagree with what they are saying.

My thoughts on the Super Bowl


   With the Super Bowl two days, everyone has put in their predictions and thoughts on the upcoming game. The game features the star studded offense of the New England Patriots and the ferocious secondary of the Seattle Seahawks.  Brady will be competing for his 4th Super Bowl trophy in his sixth appearance. We are looking to stop Wilson from winning his second trophy in a row. My thoughts on the game are very simple. I am a Patriots fan. I always have been. So, I believe that the Pats, after 1 hour of football, will come out victorious against the Seahawks. I feel the following will be the final score:
35-21 Patriots 

   After their week 2 loss against the Chiefs, The Patriots have bounced back and have never been stronger. I believe that Brady is simply more talented and more experienced than Wilson and he will perform and be stronger on Sunday than the Seahawks. With the media controversy of Deflate-Gate, this has pinned us against the rest of the world and we will put them in their place, like we do time and time again. I feel that that the Defensive line led by Wilfork will shut down Lynch and Gronk will overpower Chancellor and throw him out of the club

Monday, January 26, 2015

What is a Sport?


          My definition of a sport is really simple: A sport is a competitive event that requires points in order to win against other teams or individuals and requires a release of energy during the competition and requires strategy in order to win the event.  By that definition, the following are sports:
Fighting(Boxing, Wrestling, MMA)
I consider all of these sports because they require points to win, but also result in a depletion in energy in said event and require some bit of strategy.

       There are many events that people might consider sports, but by my definition, are not sports. Lawn games, while they are fun and competitive, they are not sports. They are simply recreational activities to play at parties. While they play against others teams or individuals, they do not require an exertion of energy. Another game that I do not consider a sport is mini golf. Mini golf is a very activity, but in no way is it a sport. It requires no energy except the energy you release during the 5 step walk between holes. I would also say that Pool is not a sport. Like I said, it is competitive and requires strategy, but requires no energy.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Journalism Final

Topic/Problem Statement      I plan to research the impacts and effects that Machiavelli played on business practices and leadership. In the fututre I want to work in the business field, so I will need some knowledge in this area of study. I have also wanted to know how an everyday office is run as to prepare myself for my future in the business world. I want to learn as much about the effects that Machiavelli played on business practices and leadership and see if the ends justify the means.
Literature Review Question
What does literature say about Machaivellian business and leadership practices?
Research for Literature Review
The research for the literature was orgainized and provided on the synthesis table.
Literature review

What does literature say about Machiavellian Business and Leadership Practices?     

     It is the start of your new job. Fresh out of college with a degree in business management. You have just been hired at a successful robotics company and are about to walk thought the door, when you hear what sounds like the managers screaming at an innocent employee for what seems like a blundered sale. You hear something that sticks out in your brain. The manager says, The ends justify the means. After hearing this you are scared, but at the same time you are feeling confident and excited about starting a job with a manager that strives for success out of every employee. This way of management is highly controversial in the business world of corporate America. In modern corporate America, there is a theory that is highly controversial and debated as ways to make you a better leader in manager in a place of business. This theory is Machiavellian leadership and management practices. This theory is derived from Niccolo’ Machiavelli, a Florentine diplomat. This theory is based on crushing the competition that lies in your path. This theory has many negative and positive aspects which is why it is debated in the corporate workplace. Literature makes it very clear of the positive and negative aspects of his principles and how it both negatively and positively affects a leader and manager in a
corporate environment. Literature makes three major points about the effects of Machiavellian business and leadership practices on a modern day businessman: the effects on modern business, his specific qualities, and the five business philosophies in business today.Literature states that Machiavellian practices play a major role in shape the leaders and managers in modern day business. Machiavellian practices specifies the difference between managers and leaders, but how they are both important in a place of business. A leader, “inspires through great ideas” (Andrew Dubrin). A manager “commands through position” (Andrew Dubrin). The two jobs are vastly different. One person uses managerial skills and power to control an office and bring in money for that company. A leader inspires workers to get jobs done to lead to success in the office. While the jobs are different, they can be together to complete one common goal. These two jobs offer different results in work, but together to lead an office to success. Mangers and Leaders in the workplace have both similarities and differences that apply to Machiavellian principles.LEADER MANAGER “Visionary Rational Passionate Businesslike Creative PersistentInspiring Tough-minded Innovative Analytical Imaginative Deliberative Experimental Authoritative Warm and radiant Cool and reserved Initiator Implementer Does the right things Does things right Inspires through great ideas Commands through position Knows results are achieved through people Focuses on results Focuses on uplifting ideas Focuses on plumbing”(Genevieve Capowski).Acts as coach, consultant, teacher Acts as a bossLiterature also states many negative aspects of Machiavellian policies in business and leadership. The name Machiavelli will live in infamy. When you hear the name Machiavelli, you immediately think corrupt and dishonest. He believed that it makes more sense for a leader to be hated rather than loved. This is sometimes true. Some of the best companies in the world are run by managers and CEOs that are strict and unrelenting. Many people, however, have other opinions. They believe that his belief in being hated, is genuinely wrong. Being hated and mean is never the answer is what manyother people believe. They would rather be kind and lose than be hated win. This statement is one, I do not agree with. I feel that it is better to work in a tough environment where you succeed instead of in a great environment where you are not successful.Machiavelli also was a believer in the very bold credo being, “Business is war. Crush the competition completely” (Forbes). This quotes makes it very clear in how he believes things should be run. According to business, it shows how he believes an office should be run to succeed in the competitive business world. Literature also shows the examples that show him being a wise business man. “It’s not the titles that honor the men, but the men that honor the titles” (Forbes). This shows how trains the men that he wants to work with him in his place of business. Literature also shows his qualities as a leader and diplomat, both good and bad. “Machiavelli’s teachings have never gone out of fashion; no doubt because power remains a central aspect of modern political and corporate life” (Galie, pg. 235). This shows that Galie believes his policies, when it comes to business, are working and successful because it has withstood the test of time. Machiavelli also inspires historical leaders to act as he does. For example, Napoleon was influenced greatly by Machiavelli. “He was a law giver, social reformer and administrator and is acknowledged as one of the greatest military genius of all time” (Parnav). The Napoleon Complex arose in Business with the introduction of Machiavellian principles. The major aspect of it is being a better leader than you appear to be. The napoleon complex is said to be short in stature, but powerful in voice. This has a very slightconnection, but it has commonalities with Machiavellian principles that are involved in modern day business strategies and decisions.Literature also states that Machiavellianism comes from 5 families or philosophies that are relevant in the business world today. Those 5 philosophies are: Machiavellianism, Darwinism, Relativism, Universality, and Objectivism. All the philosophies will lead to success, but it is made clear that Machiavellianism will lead to the most success. Machiavellianism is all about “cunning statecraft and duplicity”(Springer). This means battling for success which is why the companies that use Machiavellianism are usually the most successful. Darwinism is about “survival of the fittest in business and politics”(Springer). Relativism is the “doctrine that truth and morality that exist in society and culture and they are not absolute”(Springer). Universality is “universal comprehensiveness in range”(Springer). The five philosophies in business all sprouted from Machiavellianism. The basic principle of the five philosophies is diverse approaches to business in companies that will lead to large amounts of earnings for different businesses. The choice in what business philosophy to use in your specific business is up to you because they all lead to success, but Machiavellianism is the number choice again and again.Literature makes many points about the effects of Machiavellian practices on business. It shows the effect it has on modern business. The specific qualities that make him a great executive and the five philosophies of business that sprouted from Machiavelli. Literature however lacked many negative aspects of Machiavelli. It showedall of his good qualities and the results of them, but there was not much information on the specific negative aspects of him and its applications to business.
Gap Identification   
 Throughout my research I found a plethora of information in different regards based on Machiavellian policies. There was an abscence of statistics and quantitative research to back up the information that was learned from the literature review. I knew from the beginning that there was not going to be a lot of statistics for this topic, but I was hoping for there to be some just to strengthen my literature review. Statistics and quantitative research is there to strengthen and explanation or an argument. Since there was not many stats on a topic such as mine, it was more difficult to argue for one side or the other.
I will be using qualitative methodology in my research study by asking working adults different questions that apply to Machiavellian policies. In regards to Machiavellian policies, recieving qualitative data will yield more results and opinions than that of quantitative methodology. Qualitative research, “ is primarily exploratory research it is used to gain an understanding of underlying reasons, opinions, and motivations”(Snap Surveys). 
Research Methods     
 I began my research process with four simple questions. These questions all apply to a modern day business environment. I needed to ask these questions to working adults. I simply walked around my neighbor like an elementary student selling chocolate bars and asked adults the 4 questions. I compiled a total of 20 adults who answerd my survey. The questions all related to Machiavellian practices. The four questions were:
1. How do you react under pressure? Do you succeed?
2. How do you react when being yelled at? Do you remain calm?
3. Would you rather work in a tense office or a peaceful office?
4. Which office do you think you will get more work done?
After the finishing the survey I brought it home and worked on the analysis and findings to see how adults feel about Machiavellian policies in business and leadership. 
Data Analysis        
 The analysis of the data collected was an extremely important part of answering my research questions.  The answers to these questions were very interesting and were extremely helpful in my study. I found that of the 20 adults; 19 of them succeed when under pressure, but 100% of the respondents would rather work in a more peaceful office. The was very interesting to me.  I also found that 100% of the sample remained calm when being reprimanded. This simply is because they are all professionals and truly did not want to show weakness in the workplace. Question 4 brought out a variety of responses form the surveyed sample. 60% of the sample stated that a tense office while harder to work in would be more efficient and get more work done. The answers to these questions helped in learning how adults feel about Machiavellian practices. 
The findings that came from my study made the opinion of the people very clear. With almost 100% of people succeeding under pressure and 60% saying that a tense office made the opinion very clear. Adults like having Machiavellian policies in a business environment. They stated that more work would get done which would lead to success for the company. Th findings in as simple terms as I can make show favorable towards Machiavellian practices in a business environment. Some even stated they feel like to economy wouldn’t be in the S@$%*er(explicit) and all businesses would be doing even better than they already are.       The findings I discovered were very interesting and showed me how adults feel about Machiavellian practices in a business. 
In conclusion, with the knowledge I gained from the literature review and the results that I found and analyzed from the 20 working adults I was able to see the true feeling about Machiavellian practices from literature standpoint and from the standpoint of an adult in a business environment. Literature showed many positive effects of the practices and the adults worked more efficiently and were able to complete more work while under the pressure of a deadline or strict boss shadowing your work like a lion about pounce on a gazelle. The results show that adults approve of Machiavellian practices. 
Work Cited
1. "A Comparison of Five Business Philosophies - Springer." A Comparison of Five Business Philosophies - Springer. N.p., 01 Dec. 1985. Web. 08 Dec. 20142. Dubrin, Andrew. Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills. Cengage Learning, 2012.3. Galie, Peter J., and Christopher Bopst. "Machiavelli & Modern Business: Realist Thought in Contemporary Corporate Leadership Manuals*." Journal of Business Ethics 65.3 (2006): 235-250.4. “ Genevieve Capowski, “Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?” Management Review, March 1994, p. 12; David Fagiano, “Managers Versus Leaders: A Corporate Fable,” Management Review, November 1997, p. 5;5. Keki R. Bhote, The Ultimate Six Sigma (New York: AMACOM, 2002); “Leaders: Salespeople in Disguise?” Manager’s Edge, Special Issue, 2007, p. 3; Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2009), pp. 8–9. ( First Quote on Table)pastedGraphic_1.pdf
8. "5 Machiavellian Business Lessons From Billionaire Aliko Dangote." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2014.9. "15 Surprisingly Great Leadership Quotes From Machiavelli." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2014.